b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
It is problematic to assess the range of the hairpin entered into FES most probably by Chopin – the arms of the mark are clearly of a different length, which happened often to Chopin. According to us, it is the top arm that is reliable, probably written first, from right to left. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
The pencilled mark written in FES over the L.H. part may be interpreted as a slur (the range of which would mimic the one of the slur in b. 81). However, it is uncertain whether it is a slur at all, hence we signalize this possibility as an alternative version only. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information |
||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
In the main text we mark the use of "harmonic legato" in the L.H. part, as Chopin did in b. 3. The first a note was also prolonged in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
As was the case with b. 4 and 79, we keep Chopin's authentic notation as almost certainly intended by the composer. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |