mUltimate Chopin

Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Pitch
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Pitch

b. 49

composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major

C-c in A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE)

E-c in FED, FES & GE2 (→GE3)
..

This bar is a literal repetition of b. 33; as was the case with that bar, Chopin signalized a change of concept of the last crotchet with compliant corrections in the teaching copies. The changed version was also introduced by GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Chopin's hesitations , GE revisions , Annotations in FES

b. 59

composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major

..

In A one can see that sharps were crossed out before the outer notes of the R.H. chord. The version with a G major chord seems to be shocking here; perhaps Chopin wrote the accidentals by mistake believing that a new phrase follows immediately the section written down in an abridged manner.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Main-line changes

b. 65

composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major

..

In A (→FE,FC→GE) the  before the 1st R.H. chord is at the pitch of d1. Chopin's patent mistake was rectified in EE; a respective correction is also in FES. The mistake resulted from rhythmic corrections in the parts of both hands that made Chopin cross out the entire bar and rewrite it on the staves below – in the crossed-out version the  was at the right pitch.
The corrections concerned the 1st L.H. crotchet (illegible) and the 2nd and 3rd R.H. chords – the top g1 note in the chord on the 3rd beat of the bar was crossed out, while in the chord on the 2nd beat it was prolonged to a minim. Therefore, it is an example of Chopin's hesitation; in the final version, he returned to the initial concept.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Chopin's hesitations , Errors resulting from corrections , Terzverschreibung error , Deletions in A , Accidental below/above the note

b. 70

composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major

d1 in chord in A (→FC→GE1)

e1 in FE (→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)
..

The version of A (→FC→GE1) may seem erroneous:

  • in analog. b. 62, the 1st chord bottom note in all sources is e1;
  • in all other chords, it is only the chordal notes that are sometimes doubled, never delays;
  • in the entire four-bar phrase (b. 68-71), the top voice is doubled an octave lower, and one does not go beyond that span of an octave. The discussed place would be the only exception in this respect;
  • e1 was present in this place in the initial version of this bar: . If the correction was aimed at changing rhythmic values only (as was the case with analog. b. 62), d1 could have been written by mistake.

However, each of the above arguments can be countered:

  • minor changes in recurring phrases is rather a rule than an exception in Chopin's works. Even in the discussed place, the L.H. part was changed (in relation to b. 61-62), in a way compliant with the version featuring d1 – lowering the bass line increases the sonic stability of a chord, which, in turn, allows for a bolder use of dissonances;
  • the d1-d2 octave delay naturally resolves to an e1-c2 sixth;
  • going from the span of an octave to a bigger one in chords or figurations is typical of Chopin, cf., e.g. the following Preludes: No. 8 in F Minor, b. 6, No. 9 in E Major, b. 2, No. 20 in C Minor, b. 2 and 6, No. 23 in F Major, b. 14;
  • the correction could have been aimed not only at changing rhythmic values, but also at changing the course of the bottom R.H. voice in a subtle way.

Therefore, to the main text we adopt the version with very distinct d1 written by Chopin. The version featuring e1 appears only in the sources of uncertain authenticity (FE and GE2), but it was initially also in A; moreover, the absence of corrections in the teaching copies proves that it was accepted by Chopin during lessons. Therefore, it can be considered an equivalent variant.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , FE revisions

b. 75

composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major

..

In the 2nd half of the bar there are no accidentals before the 2nd and 4th bottom voice quavers in A (→FC,FE→EE1). It must be an oversight of Chopin, who, in his mind, changed the key to D major as the notation of g turned to a. The necessary accidentals were added in GE and EE2; in turn, the incomplete notation was not problematic for the pupils, since none of the teaching copies contains annotations here.
The  visible in FC before the last quaver was added later. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE