![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
b. 16-18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
The stem prolonging the g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Errors in GE , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
It is problematic to assess the range of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
The pencilled mark written in FES over the L.H. part may be interpreted as a slur (the range of which would mimic the one of the slur in b. 81). However, it is uncertain whether it is a slur at all, hence we signalize this possibility as an alternative version only. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information |
||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources |