Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
b. 16-18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
The stem prolonging the g quaver was overlooked both in FE (→EE1) and GE). Chopin added it in FED and FES; moreover, in both copies he also prolonged the last a quaver. We consider that addition, most probably introduced independently in each of the copies, a development of the original idea and adopt it to the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Errors in GE , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
It is problematic to assess the range of the hairpin entered into FES most probably by Chopin – the arms of the mark are clearly of a different length, which happened often to Chopin. According to us, it is the top arm that is reliable, probably written first, from right to left. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
..
The pencilled mark written in FES over the L.H. part may be interpreted as a slur (the range of which would mimic the one of the slur in b. 81). However, it is uncertain whether it is a slur at all, hence we signalize this possibility as an alternative version only. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information |
||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 15, Prelude in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources |