data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Some of the marks entered into FED pose interpretive challenges:
- There is a poorly visible mark over the b
1 quaver. According to us, it represents two digits, most probably a one replaced with a two.
- The middle one from the group of 3 small quavers is provided with a 1 both over and under the note. Allegedly, the bottom digit was entered by Chopin and then repeated by the pupil in the sequence of the remaining digits.
- The digit over the last of the three small notes was being changed in FED; however, it is the shape of a two that is most distinct among the few overlapping lines. Such an interpretation is confirmed by the entry in FES.
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FED, Differences in fingering, Annotations in FES
notation: Fingering
Back to note