mUltimate Chopin

Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-15
p. 1, b. 1-15
p. 2, b. 16-33
Main text
Main text
FCI - Fontana's copy of earlier version
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESch - Scherbatoff copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE1a - Corrected impression of EE1
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1a
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FCI - Fontana's copy of earlier version
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FES - Stirling copy
FESch - Scherbatoff copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
GE3 - Corrected impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE1a - Corrected impression of EE1
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1a
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 9

Chopin most probably changed in A the rhythm of the R.H. top voice. Initially, the f2 minim was provided with two dots only, while e2 was a quaver, which was changed by an additional third dot next to the minim and an additional second flag to the quaver. It is indicated by:

  • the fact that the e2 semiquaver was placed exactly above the penultimate L.H. semiquaver;
  • the difference in the notation of the dots prolonging the f2 minim – the third one is placed higher than the previous ones and is smaller, which means that it was entered at a different time.

We observe an earlier version of rhythm in FCI both here and in b. 7. Could a similar correction take place in A also in that bar? It is difficult to say – the notation neither excludes nor confirms such a possibility.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A

notation: Rhythm

Missing markers on sources: FCI, A, FC, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, FESch, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE1a
Complete ➔