Issues : Errors in EE
b. 7-9
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
Nothing indicates that the fingering of EE could be authentic. What is more, a mistake was most probably committed in b. 8 – in the middle of the bar, the b-a notes should be, apparently, played with the fingers 2-1, as they were in the previous bar, in an analogous place. In the copied fingering, it is, however, impossible to reach d at the beginning of the 4th group without crossing the fingers, which should have been marked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
Arpeggio in EE resulted from a mistake of the engraver of EE1, who placed it in b. 7 instead of b. 8. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 27-30
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
Instead of present in the final version in b. 28, FCI features a mark already in b. 27, which is then repeated in b. 30. As in many other places, Chopin reduced the number of dynamic indications while preparing the Prelude for print; in this case, however, he added leggiero to specify the mark. In EE1 leggiero was most probably overlooked by the engraver, which was corrected in EE2, probably after having compared it with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |