Verbal indications
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 27-30
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
Instead of present in the final version in b. 28, FCI features a mark already in b. 27, which is then repeated in b. 30. As in many other places, Chopin reduced the number of dynamic indications while preparing the Prelude for print; in this case, however, he added leggiero to specify the mark. In EE1 leggiero was most probably overlooked by the engraver, which was corrected in EE2, probably after having compared it with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
It remains unclear how the copyist could have distorted the dynamic indication – after all, the indication in A is absolutely legible. Perhaps Fontana, who copied an earlier version of the Prelude, featuring cresc. in this place, remembered that indication and entered it into FC, not having noticed that Chopin changed the dynamic concept of the ending in the meantime. Anyway, nothing indicates that Chopin would have liked to return to the initial dynamic version. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
In the version prepared for print, Chopin considered the dynamic indications of the final chords to be superfluous. Cf. the notes in b. 27 and 31. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »