



Page:
Source:
p. 1, b. 1-23
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
copy link
Main text

The missing ending of the L.H. slur in b. 14-16 in FC must be a result of distraction of the copyist, who forgot to continue the slur in a new line (he also overlooked the slur in b. 18-19; cf. also the note to b. 5-10). This mistake – not continuing the slur in a new line – was repeated in GE, in which the slur is already absent in b. 13 due to a different division of the text into great staves.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, Errors of FC, Errors repeated in GE
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
A, FC, As, CGS, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, FESch, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE1a