![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
Nothing indicates that the fingering of EE could be authentic, although it is probably compliant with the Chopinesque idea. The presence of both a slur and a legato indication suggests the use of "harmonic legato" (holding elements of a chord with fingers) and the following fingering: category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
A comparison with similar b. 2, 10 and 12 proves that Chopin wanted the c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Fontana's revisions |
|||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
The absence of a tie to d2 is almost certainly a mistake by the engraver of FE (→EE1). The tie was added in EE2, presumably upon a comparison with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |