b. 55
The slur of CK raises serious doubts in terms of both its range and placement – nowhere else does the slur encompass two such L.H. figures or is placed under the notes. Therefore, it is probably an inaccuracy or a mistake; it may have had something to do with a slur concerning only one of the figures or emphasising the bass sequence: c-A-G. Since it is absent in the principal source – CJ – in the main text we do not include this questionable mark. The slurs of CB are part of a comprehensive revision – see b. 6-19.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Errors of JC, Balakirev's revisions, Errors in CK, Inaccuracies in CK
notation: Slurs