mUltimate Chopin

WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 48-64
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-47
p. 3, b. 48-64
Main text
Main text
A1 - Working autograph
CJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
CK - Kolberg Copy
CB - Balakirev Copy
EL - First edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A1 - Working autograph
CJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
CK - Kolberg Copy
CB - Balakirev Copy
EL - First edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 56

Unslashed grace note in A1 & CB

Slashed grace note in CJ, CK & EL

In #A one can see that Chopin initially provided the trilled note with the value of a double dotted minim, whereas the c2 note ending the trill – with the one of a quaver. It was still in A1 that he changed it to a semibreve and a non-slashed grace note. Therefore, the notation of [A2] featuring a slashed grace note, confirmed by CJ and CK, may be considered the last stage of the process of delaying the moment of playing the final c2 note. However, the difference in the notation of the grace note does not have to be meaningful, since in the Chopinesque notation both versions can be equal.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Deletions in A, Corrections of AI

notation: Rhythm

Missing markers on sources: A1, CJ, CK, CB, EL
Complete ➔