Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 21-47
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-47
p. 3, b. 48-64
Main text
Main text
A1 - Working autograph
CJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
CK - Kolberg Copy
CB - Balakirev Copy
EL - First edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A1 - Working autograph
CJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
CK - Kolberg Copy
CB - Balakirev Copy
EL - First edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 21-24

3 slurs in bars 22 & 24 in A1, literal reading

w slurs in bars 22 & 24 in A1, contextual interpretation

Supplemented A1 slurs, our alternative suggestion

No slurs in CJ, CK & EL

8 slurs in CB

[legato] suggested by the editors

In the fragment (b. 21-32) that starts here we can encounter a few L.H. slurs marked in a draft manner in A1 – two slurs in b. 22 and one in b. 24. It is only the latter that encompasses an entire four-quaver figure; however, it seems that both earlier ones, although much shorter, bear the same meaning. According to us, Chopin wrote these slurs only just the second time, since the first time (b. 21 and 23) he focused on writing new accompaniment figures correctly. There is no doubt that all bars are to be performed similarly, which leads to our alternative suggestion to add slurs. Since [A] (→CJ,CK) does not feature any slurs in these bars, in the main text we suggest repeating the indication legato, used in b. 6-7, instead.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, Balakirev's revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A1, CJ, CK, CB, EL