Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 48

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

Slur in A1

No slur in CJ, CK (→CB) & EL

Our variant suggestion

..

In the main text we include this slur, present only in A1, in a variant form.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

b. 48

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

2 slurs in CK

..

Both slurs in this bar were written only by Kolberg in his copy. However, there is no reason to assume that they could be inauthentic, hence we include them in the main text, considering their absence in CJ to be an oversight of the copyist.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of JC

b. 48-62

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

No slurs in A1, CJ, CK & EL

Slurs in CB

..

In CB all L.H. quavers are provided with slurs grouped by four quavers – see b. 6-19. Due to the presence of slurs in other sources, we discuss b. 49, 55 and 58 separately.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Balakirev's revisions

b. 49-50

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

No slurs in A1 & EL

Slur in bar 49 in CJ & CK

Slur in bars 49-50 in CB

2 slurs suggested by the editors

..

In the main text we give the slur of [A2] (→CJ,CK) in b. 49 and add another one in b. 50. The absence of the slur in EL – see b. 5-6. The slur of CB is arbitrary.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Balakirev's revisions

b. 49

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

No slurs in #A!, CK & EL

Slurs in CJ & CB

..

In CJ the slur is written over the 1st group of the L.H. quavers. The second group is marked as repetition of the first, which, in this context, most probably also concerns the slur. There is no reason to question the authenticity of this slur, hence its absence in CK is probably a result of Kolberg's oversight. The slurs in CB are part of a comprehensive revision – see b. 6-19.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Balakirev's revisions , Errors in CK