![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Scope of dynamic hairpins
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 25-26
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
The category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||||
b. 29-30
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In CJ and CK the accent in b. 30 is clearly shorter than the mark in b. 29, hence we interpret them as a short and long accent, respectively. It is compliant with the harmonic and rhythmic context of the accented notes – e2 in b. 29 creates a tense delay, whereas d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Balakirev's revisions , Revisions in EL |
|||||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In the main text we give the concordant version of CJ and CK. The mark moved to the beginning of the bar is probably Kolberg's revision in the Stichvorlage for EL, which could be a correct guess of Chopin's intention in this case. The overlooked hairpin is most probably Balakirev's mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||||
b. 48
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
We keep the notation of CJ and CK. The moved or prolonged category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 52
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »