data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
e1 in the version of CK (→CB) and EL must be Kolberg's mistake – in A1 one can see that the note was corrected from e1 to c1. The version with c
1 is an unquestionable Chopinesque improvement – it alleviates the impression of A-e1 having been moved parallel to F
-c
1, which opens the next bar.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information
issues: Corrections in A, Terzverschreibung error
notation: Pitch