Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 59-98
p. 1, b. 1-26
p. 2, b. 27-58
p. 3, b. 59-98
p. 4, b. 99-132
p. 5, b. 133-162
p. 6, b. 163-192
Main text
Main text
AI - Working autograph
AF - Autograph fair-copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AI - Working autograph
AF - Autograph fair-copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 81-88

There is no slur over b. 81-88, written in the margin of AF. It is probably Chopin's oversight, although it is also likely that the composer was afraid that a slur could have hampered the interpretation of the notation on the added staves (by hand). Anyway, there is no doubt that the added fragment was also supposed to be included in the slur encompassing b. 80 and 89, written on the main staves.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, Errors resulting from corrections

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: AF, AI, FE1, FED, GE1, GE2, EE1