Page:
Source:
p. 4, b. 99-132
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
The fact that the slur is not continued on a new line (b. 120) is a patent mistake of FE, revised in EE. The continuous slur of GE is also erroneous, although, while looking at the slurs of AF, one can easily imagine that if the slur of [AG] in b. 120 were even slightly longer, the engraver of GE1 could have interpreted such overlapping slurs in this manner.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, Uncertain slur continuation
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
AF, AI, FE1, FED, GE1, GE2, EE1