Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 133-162
p. 1, b. 1-26
p. 2, b. 27-58
p. 3, b. 59-98
p. 4, b. 99-132
p. 5, b. 133-162
p. 6, b. 163-192
AI - Working autograph
Main text
AI - Working autograph
AF - Autograph fair-copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AI - Working autograph
AF - Autograph fair-copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF AI - Working autograph


  b. 145-147

No slurs in AI

2 slurs in AF & GE

2 slurs in FE

Slur in bar 147 in EE

The longer slur of FE may result from Chopin's proofreading, which is indicated by its absence in EE. Even if this was the case, according to us, it does not have to mean that Chopin wanted to change the concordant slurring of AF and GE, since the composer could have encompassed with a slur the entire phrase without noticing the slur in b. 147, which was moved under the stave in FE (it also cannot be ruled out that the engraver of FE misinterpreted this detail in the Chopinesque proof entry).
The missing slurs in AI are most probably an oversight – see b. 141-143.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: AF, AI, FE1, FED, GE1, GE2, EE1