Pitch
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The version of GE is most probably erroneous – it was the text of the next bar that was written, in which there is no b in the L.H. due to b, the 2nd R.H. quaver. In the discussed bar, the presence of b in the chords is advantageous both in terms of harmony (b from the previous bar moves to b) and dynamics – entry of the G major chord in dynamics. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 94-96
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
AI and AF (→FE→EE) are lacking in the sharps restoring f2 at the end of b. 94 and f1 at the end of b. 96, as a result of which it is only GE that contain the correct text – cf. b. 2 and 4, which Chopin wrote without mistakes in both Stichvorlage autographs. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
We add a cautionary before b1 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary before f1. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |