![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The accent in AF is quite short in this bar, hence it is its shape and context that make us consider it a long accent. The presence of a significantly longer mark in FE (→EE) – such as in analogous b. 17 – points to a possible intervention of a reviser or perhaps Chopin himself. A change performed on Chopin's order would confirm the mark to be a long accent. The mark in GE1 was placed inaccurately, so it is not entirely certain which beat of the bar it concerns. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The two accents written in AF in analogous b. 19 and 111 have the characteristics that are frequently encountered in the notation of short accents – the mark tilted upwards and a relatively big angle between the arms. However, the mark in the discussed bar is less characteristic in this respect; therefore, we assume that it is a long accent. In FE (→EE) it was placed under the L.H. chord by mistake, which Chopin then corrected in the last stage of proofreading by adding a second accent under the R.H. triplet. According to us, the added accent – certainly long – tips the balance in favour of long accents in all analogous bars. The short accent in GE may be considered an alternative version. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 124-125
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the continuous slur of AF, reproduced in FE and EE with minor inaccuracies related to the transition to a new line, starting from b. 125 – in EE the slur in b. 124 was led to the g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||||||||
b. 127-129
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The notation of the tenor voice slurs eventually found its shape in AF. Probably due to layout complications in b. 128, the slurring of the remaining sources is incomplete or inaccurate:
In the main text we give the slur of AF, completed with a slur for the alto voice, written in this autograph in analogous b. 35-37. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||||||
b. 131-132
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in b. 39-42, in the main text we give the slur of AF, which emphasises the a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Authentic corrections of FE |