Verbal indications
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the indication, which is a part of a more detailed, and probably also the latest, notation of this fragment in AF. Cf. the notes in b. 92. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 142-145
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The cresc. indications in b. 142 and 145 most probably come from [AG] (→GE). One could assume that in the autograph the indications were overlaid on a hairpin – – a combination Chopin would willingly use. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 150-153
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
It is difficult to say whether Chopin forwent the contrasting dynamic indications in b. 150 and 152-153 entered into AF (→FE→EE) while writing [AG] (→GE) or whether they were added later, after [AG] had already been written. Therefore, in the main text we leave it to the discretion of the performer whether to include them or not. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 153
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The indication was added in FE in the last stage of proofreading. Without [AG] it is difficult to say whether the same was true of GE or whether Chopin wrote it already in the aforementioned autograph. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »