Both autographs are lacking in the 
restoring e on the 3rd beat of the bar, which is a patent oversight. The accidental was added in FE (→EE), which could have been performed by the reviser. It is also present in GE, and the layout of the accidentals before this dyad in GE1 also points to the fact that the sign was added in print (cf. the correct layout in GE2).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Omissions to cancel alteration, GE revisions, Errors of A, FE revisions
notation: Pitch