



Pitch
b. 12-20
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The cautionary flats before a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before e category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Both accents in A1 are undoubtedly long accents, which was not reproduced in FE (→EE). In GE1 it is only the mark in the L.H. that can be considered a long accent; however, according to us, a shorter accent in the R.H. is almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation, even if it was somehow justified in the notation of [A2]. GE2 unified the accents and considered the longer mark in the L.H. to be inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The version of EE is a double Terzverschreibung, committed in FE, in which Chopin corrected it in the last stage of proofreading (it is proven by evident traces of correction in print). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |