Issues : Authentic corrections of GE
|
b. 68
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In the main text we include the pedalling added by Chopin in [A2] or in the proofreading of GE1. A similar situation can be found in b. 72. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
|
b. 68
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The second out of three category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
|
b. 69-71
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In the main text we include the accents added by Chopin in the proofreading of GE or in [A2]. The accent of GE2 in b. 69 is placed between the crotchets, which is a patent mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Just like in b. 68, in the main text we include the pedalling added by Chopin in [A2] or in the proofreading of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
|
b. 72-75
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Just like in the previous bars, 4 subsequent accents must have been added in the proofreading of GE1 or earlier, still in [A2]. The mark in b. 74 is poorly visible, as a result of which it was overlooked in GE2. According to us, it is, however, a print defect and not a remaining element after removal of that accent. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE |
in 
