Issues : Long accents
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 67-68
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The interpretation of the mark of GE1, which resembles a long accent but goes beyond the bar line, is not obvious. One can interpret it as a short diminuendo hairpin, leading to and corresponding to the mark in b. 66. In the main text we give a short accent, introduced by Chopin in A1 (→FE→EE), since, according to us, even if the mark in [A2], reproduced in GE1, resembled a long accent, it would have probably meant the same thing as the remaining accents in this section: see b. 60-64. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 77-80
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
These bars are not written out in A1, since Chopin marked them in an abridged manner as repetition of b. 61-64. Just like there, the accents in b. 77 and 80 may be considered long, although it is probably simply an inaccuracy of notation. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »