Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-36
p. 1, b. 1-36
p. 2, b. 37-72
p. 3, b. 73-104
Main text
Main text
Afrag - Autograph fragment
A1 - Autograph fair-copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
Afrag - Autograph fragment
A1 - Autograph fair-copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Second French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 21-22

Slur from f1 in A1

Slur from e1 in FE (→EE) & GE

According to us, there is no reason to interpret the beginning of the slur of A1 differently than in an analogous phrase four bars earlier. In spite of that, in FE (→EE) the beginning of the slur was placed already over the e1 minim. It implies that the same slur in GE may also be inaccurate, hence we consider both possibilities equal. However, in the main text we preserve the text of the principal source, since in [A2] Chopin, having changed the articulation of the initial motif of this phrase, could have led the next slur slightly differently too.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: Afrag, A1, FE1, FE2, FED, GE1, GE2, EE1