Page:
Source:
p. 1, b. 1-36
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
The comparison of all analogous places (b. 3-5, 27-29 and 59-61) as well as of the similar motifs in b. 7, 11 and analog. leads to the following conclusions:
- the beginning of the slur of Afrag is most probably inaccurate – the slur is also supposed to encompass the semiquaver, just like in b. 11. Presumably, the slur of GE is also similarly inaccurate;
- the absence of a slur in b. 3-4 must be an oversight of A1. Chopin probably meant 2 slurs here, just like in b. 27-29;
- the slur of FE1 (→EE) is a distorted slur of A1, which was corrected by Chopin in FE2.
We provide the main text with the version of FE2, which can also be considered a contextual interpretation of GE.
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Inaccuracies in A
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
Afrag, A1, FE1, FE2, FED, GE1, GE2, EE1