|
|
Slur reaching beyond bar 6 in Afrag, GE & contextual interpretation of A1 |
|
|
Slur to end of bar 6 in A1, literal reading |
|
|
Slur to end of bar 5, interpretation |
|
|
The slurs of Afrag and GE are unequivocal; since such a slur is featured in all analogous bars in GE, we give it – as present in [A2] – in the main text. The slur of FE is clearly erroneous, which was corrected in FE2 and EE, most probably on the basis of comparison with b. 1-2. The slur of A1 is problematic; just like the remaining slurs in the 1st line of the manuscript, it reaches the end of the bar, yet its shape suggests that it is supposed to be led to the beginning of the next bar. It is explicitly confirmed by the fact of ending the slur in b. 11 (on a new line) as well as by the unequivocal slur in b. 25-27, corrected by Chopin. In such a context, we interpret the slur of A1 as reaching the 1st quaver in b. 7.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, FE revisions, Uncertain slur continuation, Tenuto slurs
notation: Slurs