data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Main text
compare
In A1 one can see that the slur over the R.H. part in b. 88 was combined with the slur in b. 89-90, written separately (led further on a new line).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information
issues: Corrections in A
notation: Slurs