|
|
7 longer, 5 shorter slurs in A |
|
|
2 longer, 10 shorter slurs in FC |
|
|
9 longer, 3 shorter slurs in FE |
|
|
12 shorter slurs in GE |
|
|
8 longer, 3 shorter slurs in EE |
|
|
12 longer slurs suggested by the editors |
In A the slurs over the motifs of the bottom voice encompass the quavers only or reach the minim in the next bar. However, the differences are almost certainly of an accidental nature, hence in the main text we unify them, assuming 6-note slurs to be more frequent in A (7 longer, 2 shorter and 3 questionable). Accidental inaccuracies are also present in the remaining sources, except for GE, in which all slurs encompass 5 notes. The majority of the doubts concerning the range of the slurs is due to the ending lines: a slur suggesting continuation is not finished in a new line (b. 418-419 in A and FC, 432-433 in A, 412-413, 420-421 and 428-429 in FE and b. 422-423 in EE). In such situations we give shorter slurs in our transcriptions, just like in b. 426-427 in A and 412-413 in 428-429 in FC, which may be thought to be dubious. EE omitted the slur in b. 420-421. Neither FC nor FE, EE and GE reproduced the notation of the Stichvorlage correctly; however, the total number of inaccuracies in this section is smaller than the first time (b. 310-333).
See b. 310-333
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Errors in EE, Inaccurate slurs in A, GE revisions, EE inaccuracies, Inaccuracies in FC, Uncertain slur continuation
notation: Slurs