Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In these bars in FED one can notice vague pencilled lines; such lines may be encountered in Chopinesque pupils' copies. They may have accompanied some verbal indications of the Master, yet it is generally impossible to guess their meaning. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information |
||||||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we take into account the fingering entered into FED, which comes from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 180
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The indication according to which the endings of both trills are to be performed by the L.H. only was added in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 267-268
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In FE b. 267 closes the line of the text. There are no ties of the R.H. minims, f-f1, therein, whereas in b. 268 it is only the tie of f that was finished. These are patent mistakes. EE ignored that partial tie while adding a tie of f1, probably on the basis of comparison with an analogous place in b. 271-272, where FE has only the tie of f1. All necessary ties in the discussed bars were added in FESf. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FESf |
||||||||
b. 273-274
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The omitted ties in FE (→EE) and FC (→GE1) must be mistakes. The tie of E was added in GE2 (→GE3), most probably on the basis of comparison with the analogous places. A tie next to g was added only just in FESf. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC , Annotations in FESf |