Issues : Fontana's revisions
|
b. 9-33
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The entire second line of A is missing the octave signs – there is no ending of the sign in bar 9 and an entire one is missing in b. 14-17. There is a similar case in b. 31-33, in which the transition into a new line provoked a mistake in the form of an unfinished octave sign, which began in bar 30. Fontana noticed and corrected only the latter, yet in FC an octave sign was added in pencil also in b. 14-17, probably by the engraver of GE1 (we do not take into account that addition in the transcription of FC, since it belongs rather to GE1). In the editions all mistakes were corrected, in FE perhaps by Chopin's orders, who proofread that edition. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Fontana's revisions |
|
|
b. 209
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
A is missing the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , FE revisions , Fontana's revisions |
|
|
b. 262
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
There is no octave sign over the R.H. minim in A (→FE→EE1). The patent mistake (particularly after comparing it with b. 130) was corrected in FC (→GE), probably by Fontana's hand, as well as in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors of A , Fontana's revisions , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|
|
b. 445
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
There is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Fontana's revisions , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|
|
b. 469-471
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
There is no accidental before the last note in b. 469 and before the penultimate one in b. 471 in A. This patent inaccuracy was corrected by Fontana in FC (→GE). Initially, both bars were deprived of the marks in FE; moreover, in b. 469 the discussed note was printed an octave too high (perhaps considering the use of an octave sign). That version was passed on to EE1, which added only the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Fontana's revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
raising g
2 to g2. The patent inaccuracy was corrected both in 
raising d to d
in