Issues : Authentic corrections of FC
b. 209-212
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
We give the dashes marking the range of cresc. from b. 203 after the Chopinesque entry in FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||
b. 213
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
||||
b. 213-214
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add the dolce indication written in b. 213 by Chopin in FC (→GE1). In subsequent GE the indication was moved to b. 214, probably by analogy with b. 81-82. See also the next note. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||
b. 213-214
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add the mark entered by Chopin into FC (→GE1). In subsequent GE, like in analogous b. 81-82, the mark was arbitrarily moved and shortened. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||
b. 215-218
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we reproduce the hairpins after FC (→GE1), into which they were entered by Chopin. A precise interpretation of the range of the marks, particularly the first one, is hampered by an inaccurate synchronisation of the notation of the R.H. minims with the L.H. quavers. In GE2 (→GE3) both marks were extended so that they encompass two full bars, which does not result from Chopin's notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |