![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 294-295
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing tie of g category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 294-295
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slur combining e with d in FE (→EE) is a result of a mistake of the engraver of FE, who misinterpreted the tie of g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we keep the notation of A, which is a result of Chopin's reflection: the version featuring the dotted minim is the original one, crossed out in this and the previous analogous place (b. 274). The presence of that removed version both in FC and FE (→EE) may be puzzling, yet it is probably a result of the copyist's and the engraver's inattention. The missing dot in GE could be explained in the same way. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Corrections in A , Errors in GE , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 306
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing arpeggio must be an oversight of the copyist and the engraver of FE: the mark in A is inconspicuous, since it is atypically placed between the accidentals, and not notes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 307-309
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The notation in normal font notes is a result of the engraver of FE (→EE) having misunderstood A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |