![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of FC
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing arpeggio in FC (→GE) seems to be an oversight. However, arpeggios are also missing in analogous b. 462 and similar b. 470; therefore, it cannot be excluded that arpeggios were added in A after the completion of FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 361-364
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing ending of the slur in a new line must be a mistake of the copyist. The error was corrected in GE2 (→GE3), most probably on the basis of analogy with b. 463-466. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 376
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The dotted g category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 395
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 293, the fingering digit written in A was not reproduced in any of the remaining sources, perhaps due to lack of understanding of its meaning. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 434-435
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing slur over the written-out arpeggio is most probably an oversight of the copyist. The slur was added in GE2 (→GE3), probably on the basis of a comparison with analogous b. 332-333. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |