Issues : EE revisions
b. 306
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A the before the middle note of the L.H. chord is placed clearly too low, which in this case could have been due to the intention of avoiding collision with the bar line. Fontana correctly interpreted the meaning of that mark in FC (→GE); however, in FE the sharp was initially ascribed to the bottom note of the chord, g. That erroneous version got to EE1 and was then corrected through the addition of a proper both in the last phase of proofreading of FE and in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Accidental below/above the note |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 307
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The 2nd small quaver in FE (→EE1) is an erroneous b1, which we interpret as b1, since overlooked accidentals are much more common than Terzverschreibung mistakes. This is how this place was revised in EE2 (→EE3), by adding a before that note. The correction in ink performed in FESf restores the correct pitch of that note, i.e. g1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 310
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
A (→FC,FE) is missing the rest opening the top voice. Since the second time (b. 412) Chopin did write a rest in an identical situation, we consider its absence here to be an oversight. The addition was performed already in GE and EE. See also the note below. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 310-333
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slurs over the motifs of the bottom voice in A are of different length: they encompass the quavers only or reach the minim in the next bar. On many occasions, it is difficult or even impossible to say conclusively which of the slurs Chopin meant. Since there is no visible reason for those actually identical motifs to have different slurs, in the main text we unify them, assuming the six-note slurs to be more frequent in A. None of the remaining sources reproduced Chopin's notation accurately; the differences in FC and FE are exclusively of an accidental nature, whereas GE1, EE and GE2 (→GE3) also introduced arbitrary changes, ordering the notation. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||||||||||
b. 310-311
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing tie of e2 must be mistakes of FE and GE1, corrected in EE and GE2 (→GE3) respectively. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |