Issues : GE revisions
b. 678
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to Chopin, this bar is supposed to be a repetition of b. 227. Due to the reasons discussed in the note concerning that bar, in the main text we interpret the mark written there by Chopin as a long accent. A similar solution was adopted also in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 681-682
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give a hairpin, written by Chopin in FC (→GE1) in b. 230 (the discussed bar is a repetition thereof). Just like there, subsequent GE arbitrarily shortened the mark and moved it over the top stave. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 682
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the hairpin added by Chopin in FC (→GE1) in b. 231, of which the discussed bar is a repetition. Just like there, the beginning of the mark was arbitrarily moved in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 683-685
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the marks written by Chopin in FC (→GE1) in b. 232-234, of which the discussed bars are a repetition. Just like there, the sign was arbitrarily moved by GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 686-687
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
These bars are an exact repetition of b. 235-236, and the Chopinesque pedalling written there in FC (→GE1) is most probably inaccurate. Therefore, in the main text we suggest the markings given by Chopin in analogous b. 103-104. Such a revision was introduced already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |