![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 678
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to Chopin, this bar is supposed to be a repetition of b. 227. Due to the reasons discussed in the note concerning that bar, in the main text we interpret the mark written there by Chopin as a long accent. A similar solution was adopted also in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 681-682
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 682
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 683-685
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 686-687
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
These bars are an exact repetition of b. 235-236, and the Chopinesque pedalling written there in FC (→GE1) is most probably inaccurate. Therefore, in the main text we suggest the markings given by Chopin in analogous b. 103-104. Such a revision was introduced already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |