|
b. 302-303
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
We keep the notation of the majority of the sources, in which the double grace note is written in quavers. However, in the face of A, one can ponder whether Chopin did not forget to add the top beam of the semiquaver beaming, since in analogous b. 404 all sources feature small semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 303
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Both here and in b. 305 Chopin crossed out the category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
|||
|
b. 305
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like two bars earlier, in the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 306
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A the category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Accidental below/above the note |
before d1 in b. 302 and before e1 in b. 303. The marks were also added in 
marks in 
before the middle note of the L.H. chord is placed clearly too low, which in this case could have been due to the intention of avoiding collision with the bar line. Fontana correctly interpreted the meaning of that mark in 
. That erroneous version got to