![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of A
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 392-393
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
A comparison with b. 266-267 and analog. (7 places in total) points to Chopin's patent mistake. Therefore, in the main text we include the ties added in GE2 (→GE3). The tie of f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of A , FE revisions |
|||||||
b. 445
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
There is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Fontana's revisions , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||
b. 493
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE1) there is no accidental before the last crotchet in the R.H. It must be a mistake, cf., e.g. analogous b. 497. Oversight of an accidental necessary for writing a note belonging to a currently valid key is one of Chopin's most frequent mistakes. A natural was added only just in GE2 (→GE3) and EE2 (→EE3); it was also added in FESf. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Annotations in FESf |
|||||||
b. 494
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A (→FE,FC→GE1) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||
b. 511-515
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The overlooked slurs are almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation, both in A (→EE) and FC (→GE1). The slur added in b. 512 (only!) in EE is probably a mistake; just like in FE, the engraver placed slurs in the entire line; however, he did not notice that in FE the line ends a bar earlier than in EE. In the main text we complete the slurring of A; such a procedure was performed also in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors of FC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »