mUltimate Chopin

Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Ornaments
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Ornaments

b. 303

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

Both here and in b. 305 Chopin crossed out the  marks in A and replaced them with double grace notes, like in b. 278 & 280.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 306

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio sign in A

No sign in FC (→GE) & FE (→EE)
..

The missing arpeggio must be an oversight of the copyist and the engraver of FE: the mark in A is inconspicuous, since it is atypically placed between the accidentals, and not notes.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC

b. 360

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio sign in A (→FE→EE)

No sign in FC (→GE)
..

The missing arpeggio in FC (→GE) seems to be an oversight. However, arpeggios are also missing in analogous b. 462 and similar b. 470; therefore, it cannot be excluded that arpeggios were added in A after the completion of FC.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC

b. 462

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio sign in A (→FE→EE)

No sign in FC (→GE)
..

The missing arpeggio in FC (→GE) seems to be an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC

b. 470

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio sign in A (→FE→EE)

No sign in FC (→GE)
..

The missing arpeggio in FC (→GE) seems to be an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC