Issues : Errors in FE

b. 548-551

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

4 accents in A & GE2 (→GE3)

3 accents in FC

No marks in FE (→EE) & GE1

..

Four accents under the bass octaves were not reproduced in such a form in any of the remaining sources. While GE2 (→GE3) contains all accents, they are placed above the octaves, which is a revision of the text of GE1 on the basis of a comparison with FC and unification by analogy (an accent was added in b. 551, which is absent in FC).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of FC

b. 554

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio signs in A (→FCGE)

No signs in FE (→EE)

..

In FE (→EE), the lack of arpeggio signs in bar 554 is undoubtedly due to an error of the engraver of FE. Similarly in bar 559.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 557-560

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

2 L.H. slurs in A (→FCGE)

No slurs in FE

Slur in bars 559-560 in EE

..

The missing L.H. slurs in b. 557-558 and 559-560 is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE. The presence of the latter in EE indicates a revision or a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 559

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio signs in A (→FCGE)

No signs in FE (→EE)

..

Just like in b. 554, the missing wavy lines in FE (→EE) must be a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 566

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Arpeggio signs in A (→FCGE)

No signs in FE (→EE)

..

The missing arpeggio signs are most probably a mistake of the engraver of FE, who could have confused the bar with one of the previous ones, similar b. 562 or 564.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE