Issues : GE revisions
b. 203-208
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the cresc. indication added by Chopin in FC along with the dashes marking its range between b. 203 and b. 212. The dashes were overlooked in GE1, yet added in GE2 (→GE3); however, the initial section of the crescendo was modified after analogous b. 71-72: cresc. was moved to b. 204 and a was added in b. 203. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
b. 205-206
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
GE3 arbitrarily introduced here the version of analogous b. 73-74, in which FC (→GE1) misinterprets the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 205
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Like in b. 73, it is only the notation of A (→FC,FE) that is undoubtedly authentic. We consider the notation of GE acceptable too. The notation of EE is inauthentic, although most probably equivalent to the remaining ones. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 206
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing in FC (→GE1) could be an oversight of the copyist, corrected in GE2 (→GE3), probably on the basis of analogy with b. 74. The missing over the mordent must be Chopin's inaccuracy: see b. 74. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Last key signature sign , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
b. 209-212
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
We give the dashes marking the range of cresc. from b. 203 after the Chopinesque entry in FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |