data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the main text we add a staccato dot, since the missing staccato mark in this place is most probably an inaccuracy. In A this bar closes the page, and Chopin could not see it when he decided to provide that note with staccato 8 bars later, otherwise he could have added a mark there. In A next to that crotchet one can see a small crossing-out: it is an unfinished head of a minim, pointing to the original concept, or, which is more likely, to Chopin's mistake. We suggest a dot, and not a wedge (cf. b. 344) while adding the mark, since the composer used a dot twice (b. 438 & 446) while repeating that section. Therefore, one can assume that he eventually reached the conclusion that a dot conveys better the performance manner of that note, perhaps taking into account the homogenous nature of the markings of the crotchet bass notes in that section.
category imprint: Editorial revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Back to note