|
|
Tie to f |
|
|
Slur - in FE (different interpretation→GE1→GE2) |
|
|
Slur & tie in EE |
|
|
Neither slur nor tie in GE3 |
The curved line in FE is present only in the 2nd half of bar 393 (the last on a page), and it is unclear whether it runs from d
1 or f1. In the face of the missing ending in bar 394, it is difficult to determine its nature – it can be a motivic slur combining d1-e1, like it was reproduced in GE1 (→GE2), or a tie of f1. The version of EE with two curved lines is probably arbitrary. In addition, it cannot be excluded that the very presence of a curved line in this place is a mistake; perhaps it was meant to be a tie of f1 in bar 392-393 – cf. the tie in bars 400-401 (it was considered erroneous probably in GE3).
In the main text, we omit this unclear and dubious marking, which results in a version compliant with analogous bars 397-398.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs