Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 33-58
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-58
p. 3, b. 59-89
p. 4, b. 90-122
p. 5, b. 123-144
p. 6, b. 145-162
p. 7, b. 163-193
p. 8, b. 194-221
p. 9, b. 222-239
p. 10, b. 240-260
p. 11, b. 261-279
p. 12, b. 280-315
p. 13, b. 316-342
p. 14, b. 343-360
p. 15, b. 361-375
p. 16, b. 376-391
p. 17, b. 392-409
p. 18, b. 410-449
p. 19, b. 450-475
p. 20, b. 476-495
p. 21, b. 496-520
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 38

The upper note of the 4th quaver was being proofread in FE (probably from g​​​​​​​1 or a1). It was inaccurately implemented – the notehead is placed too high and a fragment of the 3rd ledger line is visible on its left-hand side. However, both GE and EE interpreted it as f1, which we also consider to be correct. If the changed note was g1, it is a simple correction of a mistake. However, if it was a1, like in analogous bar 34, we are dealing with a Chopinesque change of the original version, most probably due to a different continuation.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Pitch

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, GE2a, FEFo