Page: 
Source: 
p. 7, b. 190-221
p. 1
p. 2, b. 1-45
p. 3, b. 46-87
p. 4, b. 88-129
p. 5, b. 130-153
p. 6, b. 153-189
p. 7, b. 190-221
p. 8, b. 222-245
p. 9, b. 246-271
p. 10, b. 272-303
p. 11, b. 304-339
p. 12, b. 340-364
p. 13, b. 365-388
p. 14, b. 389-414
p. 15, b. 415-465
p. 16, b. 466-495
p. 17, b. 496-520
p. 18
GE3 - Second German edition
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEFo - Forest copy
FEH - Hartmann copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2a - Altered impression of GE2
GE3 - Second German edition
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected impression of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF GE3 - Second German edition

Original in: Biblioteka Narodowa, Warsaw


  b. 205

Slurs in FE (→GE1GE2)

Slurs in EE

Slurs in GE3

In the 1st half of the bar, FE (→GE1GE2) has different slurs for the R.H. and for the L.H. We unify them in the main text by changing the slur in the L.H. after the slur in the R.H.; a similar change was introduced in EE. In GE3, the slurs were changed in the parts of both hands, assimilating the slurring of this bar to analogous bar 449. According to us, this solution, generally totally arbitrary, may be considered a justified attempt at reconstructing Chopin's intention, assuming it was inaccurately reproduced by FE (after all, it is quite likely that it was already in [A] that the slurs were being written hastily and inaccurately).  

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FED, FEH, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, GE2a, FEFo