Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Rhythm
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Rhythm

b. 14

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Whole-bar rest in FE (→GE1GE2)

No rest in EE & GE3

..

The rest on the top stave is most probably a mistake – in this bar, both parts are still written on the bottom stave. This is how it was interpreted in EE and GE3, where the rest was removed.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 60

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

GE features an erroneous rhythm on the 2nd quaver of the bar, i.e. ​​​​​​​ – one beam is missing.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors

b. 61

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Semiquavers in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

Dotted rhythm in GE3

..

We may doubt whether the rhythmic variant occurring in FE (→EE,GE1GE2), almost unnoticeable in relation to analogous bars 60, 288 and 289, was intended by Chopin. Similar types of imprecise notation took place in Chopin’s works, cf., e.g. bar 377. Therefore, we cannot rule out that it is the unified, concurrent with the remaining bars version in GE3 that corresponds to the composer's intent.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Dotted or even rhythm

b. 66-67

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No tie to e1 in FE (→GE,EE)

Tied e1 suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we suggest prolonging the e1 quaver in bar 66 to the next bar, like Chopin marked it – probably during the last phase of proofreading – in analogous bars 294-295. Taking into account the fact that this insignificant detail of accompaniment appears two times in total a few minutes apart, we consider inadvertence to be a more likely reason for discrepancies in the notation of analogous bars than an intention to differentiate between those places.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Omitted correction of an analogous place

b. 67

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Crotchet a in FE (→GE,EE)

Quaver suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we shorten the a crotchet to a quaver, in accordance with the notation of that place in analogous bar 295. The return of that fragment of the main theme seems to be written more carefully – cf. the previous note. However, a longer hold of that note does not negatively influence the sound – the bass note on the 2nd quaver of the bar is provided by cellos, whereas g​​​​​​​ in violas may be considered the resolution of the a seventh. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions