Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Among all the bars opening the main phrases of the theme (analogous to bar 17), this bar is the only one devoid of pedalling markings (excluding bars 52 and 280, in which the entire thematic phrases are written without pedalling). In this situation, inaccuracy of notation seems to be highly likely; therefore, we suggest adding those markings in the main text. The same pedalling was given already in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 97
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the upper note of the last quaver in the L.H. is an erroneous f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 100-103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In GE3, all semiquavers were provided with staccato dots. It is a part of a large-scale arbitrary revision of performance indications in this Tutti. Similarly in bars 328-331. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato marks in the 1st half of the bar in FE must be an oversight, completed both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
in 
1. The mistake was rectified in 
